- CWPM Home
- 1. AFCARS
- 2. CAPTA
- 3. Independent Living
- 4. MEPA/IEAP
- 5. Monitoring
- 6. CCWIS
- 7. Title IV-B
- 8. Title IV-E
- 9. Tribes/Indian Tribal Organizations
- Search the Child Welfare Policy Manual
- Additional Resources
- User Guide
- Withdrawn Child Welfare Policies
- References
- Print the Manual
- Additions to the Manual
- Deletions to the Manual
- Modifications to the Manual
- Cumulative Change History of Questions & Answers
6.16B. Cost allocation for new CCWIS
Answer
A new system may be classified as a CCWIS if 1) the system as a whole meets, or when completed will meet, the CCWIS project requirements at section 1355.52; and, 2) all of the system's automated functions meet the CCWIS design requirements of section 1355.53.
If the system as a whole meets the above two requirements, ACF separately evaluates each automated function. An automated function may qualify for CCWIS cost allocation if it meets three conditions. Those conditions are: 1) the automated function supports programs authorized under titles IV-B or IV-E, and at least one requirement of section 1355.52 or, if applicable section 1355.54; 2) the automated function is not duplicated within the CCWIS or systems supporting child welfare contributing agencies and 3) the automated function is consistently used by all child welfare users responsible for the area supported by the automated function.
Source/Date
11/9/2016
Legal and Related References
45 CFR 1355.51; 45 CFR 1355.57(b); 81 FR 35450 at 35474 - 35475 (issued June 2, 2016); 80 FR 48200 at 48205 and 48220 - 48221 (issued August 11, 2015)
Answer
"Consistently used" means that public and private child welfare workers use an automated function as required by the title IV-E agency. Examples of an automated function not being consistently used are:
- workers interpreting data fields differently than instructed and entering incorrect data because the CCWIS data fields are not clearly labeled; and
- workers skipping required steps and screens because they are not consistently trained on the CCWIS case management tool.
The phrase "by all child welfare workers responsible for the area supported by the automated function" means that all workers responsible for a task use the automated function(s) designed for the task in the manner required by the title IV-E agency. Examples of all workers responsible for a task not using the required automated function are:
- some workers using different automated assessment tools when the title IV-E agency requires that all workers conducting assessments use a specified automated assessment tool; and
- some workers not entering home visit notes into CCWIS within the timeframe required by the title IV-E agency.
This question and answer is repeated in the Initial Submission and Cost Allocation for Transitioning Systems sections.
Source/Date
9/19/2019
Legal and Related References
45 CFR 1355.52(i)(1)(iii)(B); 45 CFR 1355.57(a)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(ii); 81 FR 35450 at 35468 and 35474 - 35475 (issued June 2, 2016); 80 FR 48200 at 48217 and 48221 (issued August 11, 2015)
Answer
A title IV-E agency determines that a CCWIS automated function is duplicated within the CCWIS if more than one automated function within the CCWIS supports the same child welfare business practice. For example, it is duplication if a CCWIS has an automated function to record contacts with children during home visits and another to record similar information from family members during home visits.
A title IV-E agency determines that a CCWIS automated function is duplicated within systems supporting child welfare contributing agencies (CWCAs) if at least one automated function in any CWCA system supports the same child welfare business practice as the CCWIS automated function. For example, it is duplication if a CCWIS and a CWCA system each had an automated function for matching children to placements.
This question and answer is repeated in the Initial Submission and Cost Allocation for Transitioning Systems sections.
Source/Date
9/19/2019
Legal and Related References
45 CFR 1355.52(a)(3); 45 CFR 1355.52(i)(1)(iii)(B); 45 CFR 1355.57(a)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(ii); 81 FR 35450 at 35468 and 35474 - 35475 (issued June 2, 2016); 80 FR 48200 at 48203 - 48204, 48206, 48217 and 48221 (issued August 11, 2015)
Answer
A CCWIS automated function is duplicated within the CCWIS if more than one automated function within the CCWIS itself supports the same child welfare business practice. If automated functions supporting child welfare business processes in the CCWIS are duplicated in a child welfare contributing agency (CWCA), we no longer consider that to conflict with the regulatory requirement for non-duplication. This is because, our initial interpretation is unduly narrow and may be a disincentive for title IV-E agencies to continue to innovate and update the CCWIS and contract with CWCAs for services as needed. Duplication exists only if an automated function for the same child welfare business practice within the CCWIS itself is duplicated, and not across the CCWIS and CWCAs. For example, it is no longer considered a duplicated function if the CCWIS supports foster care placement activities and a CWCA system duplicates that support. Therefore, CCWIS automated functions that are duplicated by automated functions in a CWCA may qualify for CCWIS cost allocation.
This question and answer is repeated in the Initial Submission and Cost Allocation for Transitioning Systems sections.
Source/Date
2/3/2022
Legal and Related References
45 CFR 1355.52(a)(3); 45 CFR 1355.52(i)(1)(iii)(B); 45 CFR 1355.57(a)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(ii)